AS TRÊS LEIS DA ROBÓTICA NA ERA DO BIG DATA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25192/ISSN.1982-0496.RDFD.V.29.II.2805Resumo
O trabalho examina os desafios das tecnologias emergentes, como robôs, inteligência artificial e algoritmos, na Sociedade Algorítmica. Contrasta-se o "Complexo de Frankenstein", que teme máquinas malévolas, com as Três Leis da Robótica de Isaac Asimov, ressaltando que, na prática, surgem questões legais e interpretativas que exigem regulamentações focadas nos seres humanos que desenvolvem e operam essas tecnologias. Argumenta-se que a governança deve priorizar a boa-fé, transparência e responsabilidade dos projetistas e operadores, em vez de se concentrar apenas nos dispositivos. A "falácia do homúnculo" é utilizada para criticar a falsa ideia de que existe uma entidade humana dentro dos programas de IA, destacando a necessidade de regular a programação e o uso dos dados. Além disso, discute-se o “efeito de substituição”, onde IA e robôs substituem humanos, impactando as dinâmicas sociais. Por fim, propõem-se três princípios jurídicos fundamentais para orientar as interações na Sociedade Algorítmica: deveres fiduciários, obrigações públicas e a prevenção da externalização de custos, aplicando esses princípios tanto a empresas digitais quanto a governos.
Palavras-chave: algoritmos; Big data; inteligência artificial; Sociedade Algorítmica; Três Leis da Robótica.
Downloads
Referências
ANGELO, Joseph A. Robotics: a reference guide to the new technology. 2006.
ASIMOV, Isaac. Mirror image. In: Robot Visions. 1990.
ASIMOV, Isaac. Robots and empire. 1985.
ASIMOV, Isaac. Runaround. In: I Robot. 1950.
ASIMOV, Isaac. The caves of steel. 195.
ASIMOV, Isaac. The last question. In: Robot dreams. 1995.
ASIMOV, Isaac. The machine and the robot. In: WARRICK, P. S.; GREENBERG, M. H.; OLANDER, J. D. (Eds.). Science Fiction: contemporary mythology. 1978.
ASIMOV, Isaac. The naked sun. 1957.
ASIMOV, Isaac. The robots of dawn. 1983.
BALKIN, Jack M. Information fiduciaries and the First Amendment. U.C. Davis Law Review, v. 49, p. 1183-1234, 2015.
BALKIN, Jack M. The path of robotics law. California Law Review Circuit, v. 05, p. 45-60, 2015.
BALKIN, Jack M.; ZITTRAIN, Jonathan. Grand bargain to make tech companies trustworthy, The Atlantic, oct. 3, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/10/information-fiduciary/502346/.
BAROCAS, Solon et al. Accountable algorithms. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, v. 165, p. 633, 2017.
BAROCAS, Solon; SELBST, Andrew D. Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Review, v. 104, n. 03, p. 671-692, 718-719, 2016.
BAROCAS, Solon; SELBST, Andrew D. Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Review, v. 104, n. 03, p. 671-692, 718-719, 2016.
BARTHELMESS, Ulrike; FURBACH, Ulrich. Do we need Asimov's Laws? Cornell University Library, 2014, p. 11. Disponível em: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1405/1405.0961.pdf.
BEAUTY.AI. Welcome to the first international beauty contest judged by artificial intelligence. Disponível em: http://beauty.ai/.
BECKETT, Lois. Everything We know about what data brokers know about you. ProPublica, 13 jun. 2014. Disponível em: https://www.propublica.org/article/everything-we-know-about-what-data-brokers-know-about-you.
CELLAN-JONES, Rory. Stephen Hawking warns artificial intelligence could end mankind. BBC, 2 dez. 2014. Disponível em: http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-30290540.
CITRON, Danielle Keats. Technological due process. Washington University Law Review, v. 85, p. 1249, 2008.
CITRON, Danielle Keats; PASQUALE, Frank. The scored society: due process for automated predictions. Washington Law Review, v. 89, p. 01, 2014.
COMAY, Joan; COHN-SHERBOK, Lavinia. Who's who in Jewish history: after the period of the Old Testament. 2. ed. Londres: Routledge, 2001.
CRAWFORD, Kate; SCHULTZ, Jason. Big data and due process: toward a framework to redress predictive privacy harms. Boston College Law Review, v. 55, p. 93, 2014.
DENG, Boer. Machine ethics: the robot’s dilemma. Revista Nature, v. 523, p. 24-26, jul. 2015. Disponível em: http://www.nature.com/news/machine-ethics-the-robot-s-dilemma-1.17881.
ELSWIT, Sharon Barcan. The Jewish story finder: a guide to 668 tales listing subjects and sources. 2012.
FAULK, Richard O.; GRAY, John S. Alchemy in the courtroom? The transmutation of public nuisance litigation. Michigan State Law Review, v. 207, p. 941, 943-944, 2007.
FROOMKIN, A. Michael. Regulating mass surveillance as privacy pollution: learning from environmental impact statements. University of Illinois Law Review, v. 2015, n. 04, p. 1713-1715, 2015.
GANDOMI, Amir; HAIDER, Murtaza. Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management, v. 35, n. 02, p. 137-144, 2015. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401214001066.
GIBBS, Samuel. Elon Musk: artificial intelligence is our biggest existential threat. The Guardian, 27 out. 2014. Disponível em: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/oct/27/elon-musk-artificial-intelligence-ai-biggest-existential-threat.
GIFFORD, Donald G. Public nuisance as a mass products liability tort. University of Cincinnati Law Review, v. 71, p. 741, 743-744, 2003.
GRAHAM, Kyle. Strict products liability at 50: four histories. Marquette Law Review, v. 98, p. 555-567, 2014.
HAVASI, Catherine. Who’s common-sense reasoning and why it matters. Techcrunch, 9 ago. 2014. Disponível em: https://techcrunch.com/2014/08/09/guide-to-common-sense-reasoning-whos-doing-it-and-why-it-matters/.
HIRSCH, Dennis D. Protecting the inner environment: what privacy regulation can learn from environmental law. Georgia Law Review, v. 41, n. 01, p. 23, 2006.
HIRSCH, Dennis D. The law and policy of online privacy: regulation, self-regulation, or co-regulation? Seattle University Law Review, v. 34, n. 03, p. 465-466, 2011.
HYLTON, Keith N. the economics of public nuisance law and the new enforcement actions. Supreme Court Economic Review, v. 18, p. 43-44, 2010.
JESTICE, Phyllis G. Holy people of the world: a cross-cultural encyclopedia. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2004.
KANT, Immanuel. Critique of pure reason. Editores e tradutores: Paul Guyer e Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
KAREL, Capek. RUR. 1921.
KEHOE, Ben et al. A survey of research on cloud robotics and automation. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2015. Disponível em: http://goldberg.berkeley.edu/pubs/T-ASE-Cloud-RA-Survey-Paper-Final-2015.pdf.
KEHOE, Ben; PATIL, Sachin; ABBEEL, Pieter; GOLDBERG, Ken. A survey of research on cloud robotics and automation. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering (T-ASE): Special Issue on Cloud Robotics and Automation, v. 12, n. 02, abr. 2015. Disponível em: http://goldberg.berkeley.edu/pubs/T-ASE-Cloud-RA-Survey-Paper-Final-2015.pdf.
KIM, Pauline T. Data-driven discrimination at work. William & Mary Law Review, v. 58, p. 857, 2017.
LEIVICK, H. O Golem. In: Golem: a new translation of the classic play and selected short stories. Tradução de Joachim Neugroschel. 2006.
LEVIN, Sam. A beauty contest was judged by AI and the robots didn't like dark skin. The Guardian, 8 set. 2016. Disponível em: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/sep/08/artificial-intelligence-beauty-contest-doesnt-like-black-people.
LOIZOS, Connie. This famous roboticist doesn’t think Elon Musk understands AI. Tech Crunch, 19 jul. 2017. Disponível em: https://techcrunch.com/2017/07/19/this-famous-roboticist-doesnt-think-elon-musk-understands-ai/.
MARX, Karl. Capital: A critique of political economy. In: The fetishism of commodities and the secret thereof. ENGELS, Friedrich (Ed.). Tradução de Samuel Moore e Edward Aveling. Mineola: Dover Publications, Inc., 2011.
MCCAULEY, Lee. The Frankenstein Complex and Asimov’s Three Laws. In: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. 2007, p. 09-14. Disponível em: https://perma.cc/AJ9F-FHTJ.
O exterminador do futuro. Direção de James Cameron. Hermdale Film Corporation, Pacific Western Productions Cinema, 1984.
O GOLEM DE PRAGA. In: AUSUBEL, Nathan (Ed.). A treasury of Jewish folklore. 1948.
O'CONNELL, Brian. Will robo-advisors benefit from the fiduciary rule? The Street, 23 fev. 2017. Disponível em: https://www.thestreet.com/story/14009692/1/will-robo-advisors-benefit-from-the-fiduciary-rule.html.
PASQUALE, Frank. The Black Box Society: the secret algorithms that control money and information. 2015.
PASQUALE, Frank. Toward a fourth law of robotics: preserving attribution, responsibility, and explainability in an algorithmic society. 2017. Disponível em: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3002546.
RASTOGI, Anupam. Artificial intelligence: human augmentation is what’s here and now. Medium, 12 jan. 2017. Disponível em: https://medium.com/reflections-by-ngp/artificial-intelligence-human-augmentation-is-whats-here-and-now-c5286978ace0.
ROBINSON, Yu. Knowing the score: new data, underwriting, and marketing in the consumer credit marketplace. 2014. Disponível em: https://www.teamupturn.com/static/files/Knowing_the_Score_Oct_2014_v1_1.pdf.
SCHWARTZ, Victor E.; GOLDBERG, Phil; SCHAECHER, Corey. Game over? why recent state Supreme Court decisions should end the attempted expansion of public nuisance law. Oklahoma Law Review, v. 62, p. 629, 629-631, 2010.
SELBST, Andrew D. Disparate impact in big data policing. Georgia Law Review, v. 49, 2017. Disponível em: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2819182.
SINTEF. Big Data, for better or worse: 90% of world's data generated over last two years. Science Daily, 22 maio 2013. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/05/130522085217.htm.
THE ECONOMIST. Combustível do futuro: dados estão dando origem a uma nova economia. 6 maio 2017. Disponível em: https://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21721634-how-it-shaping-up-data-giving-rise-new-economy.
VIOLINO, Bob. Big data and robotics: a long history together. ZDNet, 12 ago. 2016. Disponível em: http://www.zdnet.com/article/big-data-and-robotics-a-long-history-together/.
ZITTRAIN, Jonathan. Engineering an election: digital gerrymandering poses a threat to democracy, Harvard Law Review, v. 127, n. 08, p. 335-341, jun. 2014. Disponível em: http://harvardlawreview.org/2014/06/engineering-an-election/.
ZITTRAIN, Jonathan. Facebook could decide an election without anyone ever finding out. The New Republic, 1 jun. 2014. Disponível em: http://www.newrepublic.com/article/117878/information-fiduciary-solution-facebook-dig ital-gerrymandering.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Jack M. Balkin
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Os direitos autorais, dos artigos publicados na Revista, são do autor e da RDFD com os direitos de primeira publicação para a Revista. Em virtude de aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, com aplicações educacionais e não comerciais, de acordo com o creative commons.
