A CONCEPÇÃO DEMOCRÁTICA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS

Autores

  • Tomás L'alík Comenius University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25192/ISSN.1982-0496.RDFD.V.28.N.III.27255

Resumo

O artigo é uma crítica à concepção liberal de direitos, que enfatiza a autonomia individual, o livre arbítrio e um espaço público neutro. A consequência é a erosão da democracia, da comunidade e a perda dos laços sociais entre as pessoas. Em contrapartida, o artigo traça características da concepção democrática de direitos, o que refuta algumas teses defendidas pela concepção liberal. A concepção democrática está orientada para a criação do bem comum no projeto de autogoverno. Além das considerações teóricas, o artigo também contém dois exemplos práticos que apontam a inadequação da concepção liberal de direitos.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

BÁRÁNY, Eduard. Pojmy dobrého práva. Žilina: Eurokódex, 2007.

BARWICKA-TYLEK, Iwona. Portrety wolności. Studium z historii idei i postmodernizmu „stosowanego“. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer, 2009.

BAUDET, Thierry: Houellebecq’s Unfinished Critique of Liberal Modernity. American Affairs, v. 3, n. 2, 2019.

BELÁS, Ľubomír. Sociálne dôsledky Kantovej etiky. Filozofia, v. 60, n. 4, 2005.

CARTER SNEAD, O.: What it Means to be a Human. The Case for the Body in Public Bioethics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2022.

CUDD, Ann. Analyzing Oppression. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

DENEEN, Patrick. Prečo liberalizmus zlyhal (Why Liberalism Failed). Trad. Ján Baňas. Bratislava: Postoj, 2022.

DWORKIN, Ronald. Justice for Hedgehogs. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2011.

DWORKIN, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. London: Duckworth, 1977.

FUKUYAMA, Francis. Liberalism and its Discontents. London: Profile Books, 2022.

GRIMM, Dieter. Constitutionalism. Past, Present, and Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

HALE, Robert. Coercion and Distribution in a Supposedly Non-coercive State. Political Science Quarterly, v. 38, n. 3, 1923.

KANT, Immanuel. Kritika praktického rozumu. Bratislava: Spektrum, 1990.

KANT, Immanuel. Základy metafyziky mravov. Bratislava: Kalligram, 2004.

KRIŠTOF, Pavol. Úvod do Aristotelovej politickej teórie. Trnava: Filozofická fakulta TU, 2019.

LABORDE, Cécile. Critical Republicanism. The Hijab Controversy and Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

MADEJ, Martin. Meze základních práv v České republice. Prague: Leges, 2018.

MÖLLER, Kai. The Global Model of Constitutional Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

PERJU, Vlad. Proportionality and freedom – An essay on method in constitutional law. Global Constitutionalism, v. 1, n. 2, 2012.

PUPPINCK, Grégor. Conscientious Objection and Human Rights. A Systematic Analysis. Leiden: Brill, 2017.

PUPPINCK, Grégor. Les droits de l'homme dénaturé. Paris: Cerf, 2018.

PUPPINCK, Grégor. Why Abortion Is No Human Right; accessed at: Why Abortion Is No Human Right (eclj.org) [03-06-2023].

RAWLS, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.

ROSANVALLON, Pierre. Counter-Democracy. Politics in an age of distrust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

SANDEL, Michael. Democracy's Discontent. America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998.

SANDEL, Michael. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

SANDEL, Michael. Spravedlnost: Co je správné dělat. (Justice: What is Right Thing to Do?). Trad. Tomáš Chudý. Prague: Karolinum, 2015.

SANDEL, Michael. The Tyranny of Merit. What's Become of the Common Good? Penguin Books, 2021.

SCHLINK, Bernard. Proportionality (1). In: M. Rosenfeld – A. Sajó (EDS): The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

STACHO, Kristián. Od Kantovej etiky k jeho praktickej filozofii. Studia philosophica kantiana, n. 1, 2017.

STACHOŇ, Marek. Kant a sociálno-filozofický rozmer idey dobra. In: D. Slančáková et al. (EDS): 3. študentská vedecká konferencia. Zborník príspevkov. Prešov: Prešovská univerzita, 2008.

TAYLOR, Charles. Philosophy and Human Sciences. Philosophical Papers. v. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.

TOCQUEVILLE, Alexis. Democracy in America. Trad. Henry Reeve. Pennsylvania State University, 2002.

VERMEULE, Adrian. Common Good Constitutionalism. Recovering the Classical Legal Tradition. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2022.

VAN DE BREEVART, Hans. Threat or Opportunity ? A Christian Perspective on Populism. Salux, 2021.

WEBBER, G.: Proportionality and Absolute Rights. In: V. Jackson-M. Tushnet (EDS): Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Downloads

Publicado

20-12-2023

Como Citar

L'alík, T. (2023). A CONCEPÇÃO DEMOCRÁTICA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS. Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia, 28(3), 05–39. https://doi.org/10.25192/ISSN.1982-0496.RDFD.V.28.N.III.27255