TWO CONCEPTS OF CONSTITUTIONAL LEGITIMACY

Authors

  • Alon Harel Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  • Adam Shinar Reichman University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25192/issn.1982-0496.rdfd%20v28i22609

Abstract

What legitimizes constitutions? A standard answer is that constitutions are legitimate only if they represent the governing people. This article identifies two different conceptions of representation. Representation can be based on the consent or will of the citizens or when the constitution reflects the “real” identity of the nation's members. Alternatively, the constitution is sometimes claimed to be legitimate because it promotes justice or, more generally, is founded on reason. While constitutions are typically founded on both claims to represent the people and claims regarding the fairness and wisdom of constitutional provisions, we have established that there are two types of constitutions: constitutions that are primarily representative (e.g., the U.S. Constitution) and constitutions that are primarily based on reason (e.g. the German Constitution). We also show that this distinction has important ramifications for how constitutions are written and ratified and how they operate. A central implication is that the legitimacy of constitutions that make the weak claims to representation – for example, constitutions that are imposed by foreign powers – can still be defended on the basis of reason.

Key-words:. constitution; constitutional legitimacy; German constitution; ratification; constitutions based on reason; representation; representative constitutions; United States Constitution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Alon Harel, Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Alon Harel is Mizock Professor of Law and a member of Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality. Professor Harel works in several fields: moral and political philosophy, criminal law theory, constitutional law theory and also law and economics and behavioral law and economics. 

Adam Shinar, Reichman University

Professor at the Harry Radzyner Law School at Reichman University. He holds an S.J.D. from Harvard Law School, where he also served as the Clark Byse Fellow. He also holds an LL.B. from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and an LL.M. from Harvard Law School. He clerked for the President of the Israeli Supreme Court, Aharon Barak, and worked as an attorney for several human rights NGOs in Israel and India.

References

ABLONCZY, Bálint, Conversations on the Fundamental Law of Hungary: Interviews with József Szájer, Hungarian Member of European Parliament, and Gergely Gulyás, Member of Parliament in Hungary. Budapest: Elektromédia, 2012

ACKERMAN, Bruce A. “The Storrs Lectures: Discovering the Constitution.” The Yale Law Journal, vol. 93, no. 6, 1984, pp. 1013–72. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/796204.

ACKERMAN, Bruce A. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.

ADAMS, John, ‘Thoughts on Government’, in HYNEMAN, Charles S.; LUTZ, Donald S. (eds). American Political Writing During the Founding Era: 1760–1805. vol. I. Washington, DC, 1983

ALBERT, Richard; CONTIADES, Xenophon; FOTIADOU, Alkmene. The Legitimacy of Internationally Imposed Constitution-making in the Context of State Building, London: Routledge, 2018

AMAR, Akhil Reed, The Bill of Rights as a Constitution. V. 100.Yale Law Journal, 1991

AOLÁIN, Fionnuala Ní. The Fractured Soul of the Dayton Peace Agreement: A Legal Analysis. Michigan Journal of International Law, 1998

ARATO, Andrew. “Redeeming the Still Redeemable: Post Sovereign Constitution Making.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, vol. 22, n. 4, 2009, pp. 427–43. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25621939.

BEETHAM, David, The Legitimation of Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1991.

BELLAH, Robert Neelly. Civil Religion in America. Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1967

BORK, Robert, The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law. New York: The Free Press, 1990.

CHOUDHRY, Sujit (ed). The Migration of Constitutional Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009

CHOUDHRY, Sujit. Old Imperial Dilemmas and the New Nation-Building: Constitutive Constitutional Politics in Multinational Polities, Connecticut Law Review, 2005

COHEN-ELIYA. Moshe; PORAT, Iddo. Proportionality and Constitutional Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013

COLÓN-RÍOS, Joel, Constituent Power and the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2020.

CURRIE, David P. The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995

DAN, Philip; AL-ALI, Zaid. The internationalized Pouvoir Constituant: Constitution-making Under External Influence in Iraq, Sudan and East Timor. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations, 2006

DELAHUNTY, Robert J.; YOO, John. Against Foreign Law. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 2005

DI FABIO, Udo. ‘The Significance of Germany’s Basic Law’. Disponível em: https://www.dw.com/en/opinion-the-significance-of-germanys-basic-law/a-, 2019

DORFMAN, Avihay; HAREL, Alon. ‘Law as Standing’. Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law, 2021

EASTERBROOK, Frank H., Foreign Sources and the American Constitution. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 2006

ELKINS, Zachary et al. The Citizen Founder: Public Participation in Constitutional Approval. Temple Law Review. V. 81, nº 2, 2008

ESTLUND, David. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009

FALLON, Richard H. “Legitimacy and the Constitution.” Harvard Law Review, vol. 118, no. 6, 2005, pp. 1787–853. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4093285.

FELDMAN, Noah. Imposed Constitutions. Connecticut Law Review, 2005

FRIEDRICH, Carl J. Rebuilding the German Constitution, II. The American Political Science Review, vol. 43, n. 4, 1949, pp. 704–20. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1951085.

GALLIGAN, Denis; VERSTEEG, Mila (eds). The Social & Political Foundations of Constitutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013

GARDNER, John, ‘Dagan and Dorfman on the Value of Private Law’. Columbia Law Review, 2017.

GIBSON, James L., et al. “On the Legitimacy of National High Courts.” The American Political Science Review, vol. 92, n. 2, 1998, pp. 343–58. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2585668.

GINSBURG, Tom; VERSTEEG, Mila. Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review? (September 2, 2013). Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Forthcoming, Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper, 2013. Disponível em: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2319363

GOSSERIES, Axel, The Intergenerational Case for Constitutional Rigidity. V. 27, n.º 4, Ratio Juris, 2014.

HAREL, Alon. KOLT, Noam, ‘Populist Rhetoric, False Mirroring, and the Courts’ Populist rhetoric, false mirroring, and the courts, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Volume 18, Issue 3, October 2020, Pages 746–766, https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaa055

HARTWIG, Matthias, ‘What Legitimises a National Constitution? On the Importance of international Embedding’, in VON BOGDANDY, Armin; SONNEVEND, Pál (eds), Constitutional Crisis in the European Constitutional Area: Theory, Law and Politics in Hungary and Romania. New York: Beck/Hart/Nomos, 2015

HASEBE, Yasuo, Constitutional Borrowing and Political Theory. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2003

HENKIN, Louis. “Rights: American and Human.” Columbia Law Review, vol. 79, no. 3, 1979, pp. 405–25. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1121801.

HUCKO, Elmar (ed). The Democratic Tradition: Four German Constitutions. New York: St Martin’s Press, 1988

JACKSON, Vicki C. Constitutional Engagement in a Transnational Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

JACKSON, Vicki C. “Constitutional Comparisons: Convergence, Resistance, Engagement.” Harvard Law Review, vol. 119, no. 1, 2005, pp. 109–28. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4093561.

JACKSON, Vicki C. Constituent Power” or Degrees of Legitimacy? ICL Journal, v. 12, nº. 3, 2018, pp. 319-344. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2018-0068

JACOBSOHN, Gary Jeffrey.; ROZNAI, Yaniv. Constitutional Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2020

KAHN, Paul W. “Reason and Will in the Origins of American Constitutionalism.” The Yale Law Journal, vol. 98, no. 3, 1989, pp. 449–517. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/796627.

KEIL, Soeren; NIKOLIĆ, Dragana. The Europeanization of National Constitutions in South East Europe: A Comparison between Croatia, Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Southeastern Europe, 2014. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1163/18763332-03801004

KOMMERS, Donald P., Book Review: The Democratic Tradition: Four German Constitutions. German Politics & Society, 1989

KOSTAL, R. W. Laying Down the Law: The American Legal Revolutions in Occupied Germany and Japan. Harvard University Press, 2019. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvnwc05m.

LANDAU, David; LERNER, Hanna (eds). Comparative Constitution Making. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2019

LAW, David S.; VERSTEEG, Mila. “The Evolution and Ideology of Global Constitutionalism.” California Law Review, vol. 99, n. 5, 2011, pp. 1163–257. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41345383.

LAW, David, ‘Imposed Constitutions and Romantic Constitutions’, in ALBERT, Richard; CONTIADES, Xenophon; FOTIADOU, Alkmene (eds), The Law and Legitimacy of Imposed Constitutions. Londres:Routledge, 2019

LOUGHLIN, Martin. ‘The Concept of Constituent Power’. European Journal of Political Theory, 2014

MAGYARORSZÁG, Alaptörvénye. The Fundamental Law of Hungary. Alaptörvény, Foundation. Disponível em: https://njt.hu/translated/doc/TheFundamentalLawofHungary_20190101_FIN.pdf.

MCCONELL, Michael W. "Textualism and the Dead Hand of the Past," 66 George Washington Law Review, nº 1127, 1997

MCGINNIS, John. ‘Foreign to Our Constitution’. Northwestern University Law Review, 2006

MCMASTER, John Bach; STONE, Frederick D. (eds). Pennsylvania and the Federal Constitution, 1787–88. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011).

MICHELMAN, Frank I. “Constitutional Legitimation for Political Acts.” The Modern Law Review, vol. 66, no. 1, 2003, pp. 1–15. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1097546.

MIKLÓSSY, Katalin; NYYSSÖNEN, Heino. Defining the New Polity: Constitutional Memory in Hungary and Beyond. V. 26, n. 3. Journal of Contemporary European Studies. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2018.1498775

MURKENS, Jo Eric Khushal. From Empire to Union: Conceptions of German Constitutional Law Since 1871. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013

MURPHY, Mark, "Theological Voluntarism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/voluntarism-theological/

Nichol, Gene R. “Toward a People’s Constitution.” California Law Review, vol. 91, no. 2, 2003, pp. 621–39. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3481340.

OELLERS-FRAHM, Karin, Restructuring Bosnia-Herzegovina: A Model with Pit-Falls. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 2005

ONU. United Nations, Guidance Note of the Secretary-General; United Nations Assistance to Constitution-Making Processes (April 2009). Disponível em: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4016589/files/1379277EN.pdf

ORGAD, Liav. The preamble in constitutional interpretation. International Journal of Constitutional Law. V. 8, n. 4, 2010. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor010

PAP, András László. Illiberalism as Constitutional Identity: The Case of Hungary. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies. V. 59, n.º 4, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2018.59.4.4

Paul Kahn has argued that this happened in the US context. See Kahn (n 9) 450.

PERJU, Vlad. ‘Constitutional Transplants, Borrowing, and Migrations’, in ROSENFELD, Michel; SAJÓ, András (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012

PERRY, Barbara A. Constitutional Johnny Appleseeds: American Consultants and the Drafting of Foreign Constitutions. Albany Law Review, 1992

PITKIN, Hanna Fenichel. “The Idea of a Constitution.” Journal of Legal Education, vol. 37, no. 2, 1987, pp. 167–69. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/42892886.

POSNER, Richard A., Foreword: A Political Court. Chicago: Harvard Law Review, 2005

RAKOVE, Jack N., Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution. New York: Vintage, 1996.

RAZ, Joseph, ‘On the Authority and the Interpretation of Constitutions: Some Preliminaries’, in ALEXANDER, Larry (ed), Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

RAZ, Joseph, The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986

RAZ, Joseph. Between Authority and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009

RAZ, Joseph. The Morality of Law. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986

RAZ, Joseph. The Problem of Authority: Revisiting the Service Conception. MINN. L. REV. 1003 (2006). Disponível em: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_ scholarship/ 752

ROZNAI, Yaniv, Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments – the Limits of Amendment Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017

RUBENFELD, Jed. Freedom and Time: A Theory of Constitutional Self-Government. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001.

RUBINELLI, Lucia, Constituent Power: A History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020

SAPIR, Gideon, The Israeli Constitution: From Evolution to Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018

SAUNDERS, Cheryl Anne, Constitution Making in the 21st Century (April 16, 2013). International Review of Law, V. 4, n. 630, 2012. Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper. Disponível em: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2252294

SCHAUER, Frederick. On the Migration of Constitutional Ideas, Connecticut Law Review, 2005

SU, Anna. Exporting Freedom: Religious Liberty and American Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016 )

TAMANAHA, Brian Z. “The Lessons of Law-and-Development Studies.” The American Journal of International Law, vol. 89, n. 2, 1995, pp. 470–86. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2204226.

TREMMEL, Joerg (ed). The Handbook of Intergenerational Justice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006

WALDRON, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999

WALLIS, Joanne. Constitution Making During State Building. Cabmbridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014

WHITTINGTON, Keith E. Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1999

Published

31-08-2023

How to Cite

Harel, A., & Shinar, A. (2023). TWO CONCEPTS OF CONSTITUTIONAL LEGITIMACY. Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia, 28(2), 50–90. https://doi.org/10.25192/issn.1982-0496.rdfd v28i22609