CITIZENSHIP INSIDE THE ENGINE ROOM OF TRANSFORMATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM IN LATIN AMERICA

Authors

  • Jorge Ernesto Roa Roa Universidad Externado de Colombia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25192/ISSN.1982-0496.RDFD.V.28.N.II.2698

Abstract

This article discusses the theses proposed by Roberto Gargarella in the books: The engine room of the Constitution and Justice before the government. The common purpose is to demonstrate that in Latin America there is a kind of transformative constitutionalism. This form of constitutionalism is concerned with materializing the changes and the social promises that Constitutions made to those who live in Latin American countries. From an institutional design point of view, transformative constitutionalism proposes that citizens have broad access to the supreme and constitutional courts. This is a pillar of social change through law. For that reason, the article also argues that mechanisms such as public action on constitutionality are relevant when discussing the democratic foundations of Latin-American judicial review.

Key-words:Transformative constitutionalism; citizenship ; deliberative democracy ; dialogic constitutionalism ; structural judgement

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jorge Ernesto Roa Roa, Universidad Externado de Colombia

Docente Investigador de la Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Doctor en Derecho (Ph.D. in Law) de la Universidad Pompeu Fabra de Barcelona (2017).

References

ACKERMAN, B. We the People. Foundations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991.

BELLAMY, R. Political Constitutionalism and the Human Rights Act. En International Journal of Constitutional Law. Vol. 9, n.º 1, 2011, 86-111.

BOGDANDY, A. V. Y; MORALES ANTONIAZZI, M. et al. Ius constitutionale commune en América Latina: un enfoque regional del constitucionalismo transformador. En BOGDANDY, A. V. Y.; MORALES ANTONIAZZI, M. y FERRER MAC-GREGOR, E., Ius Constitutionale Commune en América Latina. Textos básicos para su comprensión. México: Instituto de Estudios Constitucionales del Estado de Querétaro, 2016, 17-51.

CEPEDA ESPINOSA, M. J. Polémicas constitucionales. Bogotá: Legis, 2007.

DIXON, R. Creating Dialogue about Socioeconomic Rights: Strong-form Versus Weak-form Judicial review Revisited. En International Journal of Constitutional Law. Vol. 5, n.º 3, 2007, 391-418.

FISS, O. The Forms of Justice. En Harvard Law Review. Vol. 93, n.º 1, 1979, 1-58.

GARGARELLA, R. La justicia frente al gobierno. Sobre el carácter contramayoritario del poder judicial. 1.ª reimp. Quito: Centro de Estudios y Difusión del Derecho Constitucional - Corte Constitucional del Ecuador para el periodo de Transición, 2011.

GARGARELLA, R. Latin American Constitutionalism 1810-2010. The Engine Room of the Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

GARGARELA, R. Recuperar el lugar del “pueblo” en la Constitución. En Gargarella, R. y Niembro Ortega, R. (ed.), Constitucionalismo progresista: retos y perspectivas. México: UNAM-IIJ, 2016, 15-61.

GINSBURG, T.; MELTON, J. y ELKINS, Z. The Endurance of National Constitutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

GRIMM, D. Constitutional Adjudication and Democracy. En Israel Law Review. Vol. 33, 1999, 193-215.

IGLESIAS VILA, M. ¿Cómo piensa los derechos la sala de máquinas de la Constitución? En Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía Política. Vol. V, n.º 3, 2016, 1-24.

KAVANAGH, A. Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

LERNER, H. Constituent Assemblies and Political Continuity in Divided Societies. En ELSTER, J. (ed.), Constituent Assemblies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, 57-78.

MOYN, S. Not Enough. Human Rights in an Unequal World. Cambridge: Belknap Press, 2018.

ROA ROA, J. E. Control de constitucionalidad deliberativo. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2019.

ROA ROA, J. E. El rol del juez constitucional en el constitucionalismo transformador latinoamericano. Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law Research Paper, n.º 2020-11, Heidelberg, mayo de 2020.

SAGER, Lawrence. Juez y democracia. Una teoría de la práctica constitucional nortea-mericana. A. Torres y V. Ferreres Comella (trad.). Barcelona: Marcial Pons, 2007.

UPRIMNY YEPES, R. The Recent Transformation of Constitutional Law in Latin America: Trends and Challenges. En Texas Law Review. Vol. 89, 2011, 1587-1609.

UPRIMNY YEPES, R. The Enforcement of Social Rights by the Colombian Constitutional Court: Cases and Debates. En GARGARELLA, R.; DOMINGO, P. y ROUX, T., Courts and Social Transformation in New Democracies. An Institutional Voice for the Poor? Engñand: Ashgate Publishing, 2006.

VERSTEEG, M. Can Rights Combat Economic Inequality? En Harvard Law Review. Vol. 133, 2020, 2017-2060.

WALDRON, J. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

YOUNG, A. Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Human Rights Act. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009.

Published

31-08-2023

How to Cite

Ernesto Roa Roa, J. (2023). CITIZENSHIP INSIDE THE ENGINE ROOM OF TRANSFORMATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM IN LATIN AMERICA. Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia, 28(2), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.25192/ISSN.1982-0496.RDFD.V.28.N.II.2698